Martin Lewis Questions Burnham's Energy Bill Cut
- 1The VAT cut saves households roughly £3.75 a month from October.
- 2The IFS says the cut isn't well-targeted to those hit hardest.
- 💡What It Means For You: If your energy supplier raises prices elsewhere, or your bills are driven mainly by gas rather than electricity, the £45 annual saving may be barely noticeable in practice.
Enjoying our coverage? Support us by adding us as a preferred source on Google:

Consumer expert Martin Lewis and the Institute for Fiscal Studies have both publicly questioned whether Prime Minister Andy Burnham's VAT cut on electricity bills will meaningfully help households, as public reaction to the policy turns increasingly skeptical.
Savings Amount To £3.75 A Month
The VAT cut reduces the rate on domestic electricity from 5% to 0% starting October 1, saving the average household roughly £45 a year, or about £3.75 a month, according to government figures.
Martin Lewis said "in practice people won't feel much benefit," particularly since the energy price cap is predicted to rise 3.1% in October — a change that would offset much of the announced saving before households notice it.
IFS Questions Whether Cut Is Targeted
The Institute for Fiscal Studies raised concerns about whether the measure is effectively targeted, pointing out that gas prices have risen more than electricity costs in recent months. The think tank warned that households facing the steepest rises in heating bills specifically may see only limited support from a cut that applies to electricity alone.
Public reaction online has echoed similar frustration, with one widely shared comment on the policy reading: "It's only £3 a month" — arguing that any savings from the VAT cut could prove short-lived if energy suppliers raise prices elsewhere to compensate.
Funding Source Faces Separate Criticism
The VAT cut is funded by scrapping the £1.8 billion digital ID programme, a decision that has drawn separate criticism from sacked minister Darren Jones over whether the cancelled programme was properly funded in the first place, a dispute TheTrendsWire has covered previously.
Chancellor John Healey, addressing his own cabinet, acknowledged the policy would not "solve the cost of living" but said it would provide reassurance over the winter months.
TheTrendsWire's Take
Martin Lewis and the IFS aren't attacking the policy's intent, they're pointing at a specific mismatch: gas prices, not electricity, are driving the sharpest household pain right now, and a VAT cut confined to electricity misses that pressure point almost by design. Pair that with an energy price cap set to rise 3.1% the same month the cut takes effect, and the "£45 a year" headline figure starts looking less like relief and more like a number that gets quietly absorbed before anyone notices it.
Read More
You Might Also Like

China, Russia Deploy Submarines Together for First Time
Jul 22, 2026

Germany Pushes to Join UK Fighter Jet Programme
Jul 22, 2026

Judge Orders Trump to Hand Over Records to BBC
Jul 22, 2026

Trump's Daylight Saving Bill Stalls in Senate
Jul 21, 2026

Canada Wildfires Rage as Trump Presses Carney
Jul 21, 2026

Sacked Minister Questions Burnham's VAT Cut
Jul 21, 2026

World News Correspondent
Rachel Hayes reports on international affairs, geopolitics, and breaking world news. Based in London, she covers stories shaping the UK and global political landscape.





